1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Quickbit eu AB vs Tink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Quickbit eu AB (Quickbit eu AB) and Tink (Tink Financial Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- Quickbit eu AB 6D Score
- 1.1
- Tink 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Tink outranks Quickbit eu AB by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.6 vs 1.1)
On supervisory breadth, Quickbit eu AB holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Quickbit eu AB | Tink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.1 | 1.6 | +0.5 | Tink |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.6 | +0.1 | Tink |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.2 | +0.4 | Quickbit eu AB |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Quickbit eu AB vs Tink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Quickbit eu AB | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Quickbit eu AB | Tink Financial Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FI: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | Vasagatan 11, 111 20 Stockholm, Sweden |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Quickbit eu AB and Tink against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Quickbit eu AB vs Tink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Quickbit eu AB or Tink?
Tink holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Quickbit eu AB maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Quickbit eu AB and Tink?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Quickbit eu AB records an Overall Score of 1.1 (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Tink at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Quickbit eu AB and Tink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Quickbit eu AB lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tink lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Quickbit eu AB or Tink?
Quickbit eu AB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.