1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Max Property Group vs MetaSoccer: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Max Property Group (Max Property Group) and MetaSoccer (MetaSoccer) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- Max Property Group 6D Score
- 5.0
- MetaSoccer 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Max Property Group and MetaSoccer are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Max Property Group holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MetaSoccer holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Max Property Group | MetaSoccer | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Max Property Group |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Max Property Group vs MetaSoccer
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Max Property Group | MetaSoccer |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Max Property Group | MetaSoccer |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | NL | ES |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Max Property Group and MetaSoccer against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Max Property Group vs MetaSoccer
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Max Property Group or MetaSoccer?
Both Max Property Group and MetaSoccer hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Max Property Group maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MetaSoccer maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Max Property Group and MetaSoccer?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Max Property Group records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MetaSoccer at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Max Property Group and MetaSoccer differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Max Property Group lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MetaSoccer lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Max Property Group or MetaSoccer?
Max Property Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MetaSoccer carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.