Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Katana vs Olive Tree Capital Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Katana (Sky Mavis) and Olive Tree Capital Markets (Olive Tree Capital Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe

Katana 6D Score
1.0
Olive Tree Capital Markets 6D Score
7.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: katana-vs-olive-tree-capital-markets

Olive Tree Capital Markets outranks Katana by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, Katana holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Olive Tree Capital Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightKatanaOlive Tree Capital MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.07.0+6.0Olive Tree Capital Markets
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.06.0+5.0Olive Tree Capital Markets
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.04.0+3.0Olive Tree Capital Markets
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.06.0+5.0Olive Tree Capital Markets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.05.0+4.0Olive Tree Capital Markets

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Katana vs Olive Tree Capital Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Katana vs Olive Tree Capital Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Katana and Olive Tree Capital Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeKatanaOlive Tree Capital Markets
Primary Legal NameSky MavisOlive Tree Capital Markets
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressInternationalMethonis Tower, 73 Makarios Avenue, 7th Floor, Office 701, Nicosia, Cyprus, 1070
Offered Asset Classes & Servicestoken swaps, token miningForex, currencies, indices, futures contracts, etc.
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, English, French, German, Other languages
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Katana and Olive Tree Capital Markets against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Katana vs Olive Tree Capital Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Katana or Olive Tree Capital Markets?

Olive Tree Capital Markets holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Katana maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Olive Tree Capital Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Katana and Olive Tree Capital Markets?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Katana records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Olive Tree Capital Markets at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Katana and Olive Tree Capital Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Katana lists token swaps, token mining with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Olive Tree Capital Markets lists Forex, currencies, indices, futures contracts, etc. with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Katana or Olive Tree Capital Markets?

Katana carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Olive Tree Capital Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Katana vs Olive Tree Capital Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire