Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXGM vs Ibinex: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXGM (FXGM) and Ibinex (Ibinex) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe

FXGM 6D Score
1.0
Ibinex 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxgm-5566-vs-ibinex

FXGM and Ibinex are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXGM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Ibinex holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXGMIbinexScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXGM vs Ibinex

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXGM vs Ibinex
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXGM and Ibinex.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXGMIbinex
Primary Legal NameFXGMIbinex
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressArtemisia Business Centre, 14 Charalambou Mouskou, 2nd Floor, Office 201, 2014 Nicosia, Cyprus.EE
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex pairs, commodities, precious metals (gold and silver), indices, ETFs, cryptocurrencies and stocksMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesSpanish, Italian, Polish, Swedish, Finnish, English, French, GermanEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXGM and Ibinex against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXGM vs Ibinex

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXGM or Ibinex?

Both FXGM and Ibinex hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXGM maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Ibinex maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXGM and Ibinex?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXGM records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Ibinex at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FXGM and Ibinex differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXGM lists Forex pairs, commodities, precious metals (gold and silver), indices, ETFs, cryptocurrencies and stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Ibinex lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXGM or Ibinex?

FXGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Ibinex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXGM vs Ibinex (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire