1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Evest Official vs Trade.Berry: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Evest Official (Evest Official) and Trade.Berry (Trade.Berry) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- Evest Official 6D Score
- 5.0
- Trade.Berry 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Evest Official outranks Trade.Berry by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Evest Official holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trade.Berry holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Evest Official | Trade.Berry | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest Official |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest Official |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest Official |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest Official |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Evest Official vs Trade.Berry
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Evest Official | Trade.Berry |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Evest Official | Trade.Berry |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | CY | Christophides House Office 201, 28 Ayias Zonis Street, Limassol 3027, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Evest Official and Trade.Berry against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Evest Official vs Trade.Berry
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Evest Official or Trade.Berry?
Evest Official holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Evest Official maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trade.Berry maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Evest Official and Trade.Berry?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Evest Official records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Trade.Berry at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Evest Official and Trade.Berry differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Evest Official lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Trade.Berry lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Evest Official or Trade.Berry?
Evest Official carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trade.Berry carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.