1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
erable vs Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of erable (erable) and Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd (FIC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- erable 6D Score
- 5.0
- Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd 6D Score
- 6.2
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd outranks erable by +1.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.2 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, erable holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | erable | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.2 | +1.2 | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.7 | +0.7 | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.3 | +1.3 | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: erable vs Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | erable | Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | erable | FIC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | CYSEC: #326/17CONSOB: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | FR | 16 Kennedy Ave. 3rd Floor, 1087 Nicosia, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX, CFDs, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), stocks, bonds |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare erable and Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: erable vs Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: erable or Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd?
Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, erable maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between erable and Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), erable records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd at 6.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.7, Brand: 6.3, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do erable and Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
erable lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd lists FX, CFDs, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), stocks, bonds with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: erable or Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd?
erable carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.