1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CoinsPaid vs RBL Labs: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CoinsPaid (CoinsPaid) and RBL Labs (RBL Labs B.V.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- CoinsPaid 6D Score
- 5.0
- RBL Labs 6D Score
- 1.4
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CoinsPaid outranks RBL Labs by +3.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, CoinsPaid holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RBL Labs holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CoinsPaid | RBL Labs | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.4 | +3.6 | CoinsPaid |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.9 | +3.1 | CoinsPaid |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | CoinsPaid |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.8 | +3.2 | CoinsPaid |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.7 | +3.3 | CoinsPaid |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CoinsPaid vs RBL Labs
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CoinsPaid | RBL Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CoinsPaid | RBL Labs B.V. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | EE | Frans Halsstraat 62E, 1072 BT |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Payment integration, instant payment and receipt of cryptocurrencies, asset storage and exchange | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CoinsPaid and RBL Labs against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CoinsPaid vs RBL Labs
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CoinsPaid or RBL Labs?
CoinsPaid holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, CoinsPaid maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RBL Labs maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CoinsPaid and RBL Labs?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CoinsPaid records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RBL Labs at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.8, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CoinsPaid and RBL Labs differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CoinsPaid lists Payment integration, instant payment and receipt of cryptocurrencies, asset storage and exchange with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RBL Labs lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CoinsPaid or RBL Labs?
CoinsPaid carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RBL Labs carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.