1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Aglaia Capital vs B2BINPAY: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Aglaia Capital (Aglaia Capital S.L.U.) and B2BINPAY (B2BINPAY ITALY S.R.L.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- Aglaia Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- B2BINPAY 6D Score
- 4.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
B2BINPAY outranks Aglaia Capital by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Aglaia Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas B2BINPAY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Aglaia Capital | B2BINPAY | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | B2BINPAY |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | B2BINPAY |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Aglaia Capital |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Aglaia Capital vs B2BINPAY
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Aglaia Capital | B2BINPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Aglaia Capital S.L.U. | B2BINPAY ITALY S.R.L. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | ES | Estonia, Tallinn 10117, Narva mnt 7b-503, Tallinn, Estonia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | B2BinPay is an Estonia-based cryptocurrency payment-solutions provider, established in 2014 |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Aglaia Capital and B2BINPAY against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Aglaia Capital vs B2BINPAY
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Aglaia Capital or B2BINPAY?
B2BINPAY holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Aglaia Capital maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas B2BINPAY maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), ) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Aglaia Capital and B2BINPAY?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Aglaia Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with B2BINPAY at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Aglaia Capital and B2BINPAY differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Aglaia Capital lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while B2BINPAY lists B2BinPay is an Estonia-based cryptocurrency payment-solutions provider, established in 2014 with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Aglaia Capital or B2BINPAY?
Aglaia Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while B2BINPAY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.