1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Agama Wallet vs BKN301: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Agama Wallet (Komodo (KMD)) and BKN301 (BKN301 S.p.A.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected forex and CFD broker records: Europe
- Agama Wallet 6D Score
- 1.0
- BKN301 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
BKN301 outranks Agama Wallet by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Agama Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas BKN301 holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Agama Wallet | BKN301 | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | BKN301 |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | BKN301 |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | BKN301 |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | BKN301 |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | BKN301 |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Agama Wallet vs BKN301
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Agama Wallet | BKN301 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Komodo (KMD) | BKN301 S.p.A. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | Via Tre Settembre 99,47891 Dogana – San Marino |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Agama Wallet and BKN301 against other regulated peers in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Agama Wallet vs BKN301
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Agama Wallet or BKN301?
BKN301 holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Agama Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas BKN301 maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM), Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Agama Wallet and BKN301?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Agama Wallet records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with BKN301 at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Agama Wallet and BKN301 differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Agama Wallet lists Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while BKN301 lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Agama Wallet or BKN301?
Agama Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while BKN301 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.