Institution record
Uphold wallet
- Source score
- 2.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (selected forex and cfd broker records: europe) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial Conduct Authority | 09281410 | Regulated | Uphold Europe Limited | — | |
The Manitoba Securities Commission | Not supplied | Regulated | Uphold Inc. | 2023‐03‐27 | |
Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) | 305967101 | Regulated | Uphold Lithuania UAB | 2023 | |
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 12‐1269875 | Regulated | Uphold HQ Inc. | — |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for Uphold wallet and other records in our selected forex and cfd broker records: europe dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uphold wallet (this record) | Financial Conduct AuthorityMSCFinancial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 |
Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 | |
CYSECCONSOB | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 6.2 | 0 | |
Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register) | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 | |
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 1.0 | 0 |
Uphold wallet: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Uphold wallet's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 4 licence entries associated with Uphold wallet (legal entity reference: Uphold wallet); 4 are labelled "regulated" and 4 are labelled regulated or registered: Financial Conduct Authority — licence 09281410, status: regulated; MSC (The Manitoba Securities Commission) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) — licence 305967101, status: regulated; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — licence 12‐1269875, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official Financial Conduct Authority, MSC, Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) public register.
Which of Uphold wallet's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's selected forex and cfd broker records: europe source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is Uphold wallet's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Uphold wallet carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.0, risk & licensing: 2.0, brand: 2.0, market influence: 2.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Uphold wallet's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Uphold wallet, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (uphold.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Financial Conduct Authority.