1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
SMART VALOR vs Tink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SMART VALOR (SMART VALOR AG) and Tink (Tink Financial Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- SMART VALOR 6D Score
- 1.6
- Tink 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SMART VALOR and Tink are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.6 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, SMART VALOR holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | SMART VALOR | Tink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.4 | 1.2 | +0.2 | SMART VALOR |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.2 | 1.6 | +0.4 | Tink |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.8 | 1.2 | +0.6 | SMART VALOR |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: SMART VALOR vs Tink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | SMART VALOR | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | SMART VALOR AG | Tink Financial Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FINMA: Not supplied | FI: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | Vasagatan 11, 111 20 Stockholm, Sweden |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare SMART VALOR and Tink against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: SMART VALOR vs Tink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SMART VALOR or Tink?
Both SMART VALOR and Tink hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, SMART VALOR maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SMART VALOR and Tink?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SMART VALOR records an Overall Score of 1.6 (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Tink at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do SMART VALOR and Tink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
SMART VALOR lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tink lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SMART VALOR or Tink?
SMART VALOR carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.