1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
pier vs Raiden Network: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of pier (pier wallet) and Raiden Network (Raiden Network) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- pier 6D Score
- 2.0
- Raiden Network 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
pier and Raiden Network are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, pier holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Raiden Network holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | pier | Raiden Network | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: pier vs Raiden Network
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | pier | Raiden Network |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | pier wallet | Raiden Network |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CH | Dr. Grass-Strasse 12, 9490 Ruggell, Liechtenstein |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare pier and Raiden Network against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: pier vs Raiden Network
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: pier or Raiden Network?
Both pier and Raiden Network hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, pier maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Raiden Network maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between pier and Raiden Network?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), pier records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Raiden Network at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do pier and Raiden Network differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
pier lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Raiden Network lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: pier or Raiden Network?
pier carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Raiden Network carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.