1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Moonlet Wallet vs Tink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Moonlet Wallet (Moonlet Wallet) and Tink (Tink Financial Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Moonlet Wallet 6D Score
- 5.3
- Tink 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Moonlet Wallet outranks Tink by +3.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.3 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, Moonlet Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Moonlet Wallet | Tink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.3 | 1.6 | +3.7 | Moonlet Wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | Moonlet Wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Moonlet Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.6 | 1.6 | +4.0 | Moonlet Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | Moonlet Wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Moonlet Wallet vs Tink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Moonlet Wallet | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Moonlet Wallet | Tink Financial Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FI: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | Vasagatan 11, 111 20 Stockholm, Sweden |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Manage assets, mortgage tokens | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Moonlet Wallet and Tink against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Moonlet Wallet vs Tink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Moonlet Wallet or Tink?
Tink holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Moonlet Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Moonlet Wallet and Tink?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Moonlet Wallet records an Overall Score of 5.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Tink at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Moonlet Wallet and Tink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Moonlet Wallet lists Manage assets, mortgage tokens with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tink lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Moonlet Wallet or Tink?
Moonlet Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.