1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Interstellar FX vs Trilt: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Interstellar FX (Interstellar FX) and Trilt (Trilt Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Interstellar FX 6D Score
- 5.0
- Trilt 6D Score
- 1.5
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Interstellar FX outranks Trilt by +3.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, Interstellar FX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trilt holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Interstellar FX | Trilt | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interstellar FX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interstellar FX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Interstellar FX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interstellar FX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interstellar FX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Interstellar FX vs Trilt
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Interstellar FX | Trilt |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interstellar FX | Trilt Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 38-38Z Georgiou Karaiskaki, Limassol 3032, Cyprus | Omonoias 51, office 201-202,3052 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, indices, precious metals and energy resources | Currency pairs, CFD products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Interstellar FX and Trilt against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Interstellar FX vs Trilt
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Interstellar FX or Trilt?
Interstellar FX holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Interstellar FX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trilt maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CNMV, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Interstellar FX and Trilt?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Interstellar FX records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Trilt at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Interstellar FX and Trilt differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Interstellar FX lists Currency pairs, indices, precious metals and energy resources with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Trilt lists Currency pairs, CFD products with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Interstellar FX or Trilt?
Interstellar FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trilt carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.