1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Interlock vs SMART VALOR: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Interlock (Interlock) and SMART VALOR (SMART VALOR AG) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Interlock 6D Score
- 2.0
- SMART VALOR 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Interlock outranks SMART VALOR by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, Interlock holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SMART VALOR holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Interlock | SMART VALOR | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 1.6 | +0.4 | Interlock |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 1.4 | +0.6 | Interlock |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.2 | +0.8 | Interlock |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.8 | +0.2 | Interlock |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Interlock vs SMART VALOR
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Interlock | SMART VALOR |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interlock | SMART VALOR AG |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FINMA: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CH | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Interlock and SMART VALOR against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Interlock vs SMART VALOR
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Interlock or SMART VALOR?
SMART VALOR holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Interlock maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SMART VALOR maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Interlock and SMART VALOR?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Interlock records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SMART VALOR at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Interlock and SMART VALOR differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Interlock lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SMART VALOR lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Interlock or SMART VALOR?
Interlock carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SMART VALOR carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.