1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GPM Broker vs Hacken: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GPM Broker (GPM Broker) and Hacken (Hacken) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- GPM Broker 6D Score
- 5.0
- Hacken 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GPM Broker and Hacken are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, GPM Broker holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Hacken holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GPM Broker | Hacken | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GPM Broker vs Hacken
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GPM Broker | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | GPM Broker | Hacken |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Calle de Montesa 38 (Pasaje Martí) Local 1, 28006 Madrid, Spain | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Capable of contract auditing, blockchain protocol auditing and penetration testing |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GPM Broker and Hacken against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GPM Broker vs Hacken
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GPM Broker or Hacken?
Both GPM Broker and Hacken hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, GPM Broker maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Hacken maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GPM Broker and Hacken?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GPM Broker records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Hacken at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do GPM Broker and Hacken differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GPM Broker lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Hacken lists Capable of contract auditing, blockchain protocol auditing and penetration testing with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GPM Broker or Hacken?
GPM Broker carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Hacken carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.