Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FxNet vs Trade.Berry: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FxNet (Fxnet Ltd) and Trade.Berry (Trade.Berry) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

FxNet 6D Score
2.0
Trade.Berry 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxnet-vs-trade-berry

FxNet and Trade.Berry are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, FxNet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trade.Berry holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFxNetTrade.BerryScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FxNet vs Trade.Berry

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FxNet vs Trade.Berry
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FxNet and Trade.Berry.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFxNetTrade.Berry
Primary Legal NameFxnet LtdTrade.Berry
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address4 Theklas Lysioti St, Harmony House, Office 31, 3rd Floor, 3030 Limassol, CyprusChristophides House Office 201, 28 Ayias Zonis Street, Limassol 3027, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCFDs, Currency pairs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, BondsIndices, Forex, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FxNet and Trade.Berry against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FxNet vs Trade.Berry

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FxNet or Trade.Berry?

Both FxNet and Trade.Berry hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FxNet maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trade.Berry maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FxNet and Trade.Berry?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FxNet records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Trade.Berry at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FxNet and Trade.Berry differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FxNet lists CFDs, Currency pairs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Trade.Berry lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FxNet or Trade.Berry?

FxNet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trade.Berry carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FxNet vs Trade.Berry (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire