Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXGM vs STOCK.COM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXGM (Depaho Ltd) and STOCK.COM (STOCK.COM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

FXGM 6D Score
5.6
STOCK.COM 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxgm-vs-stock-com

FXGM outranks STOCK.COM by +4.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXGM holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STOCK.COM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXGMSTOCK.COMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.61.0+4.6FXGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.01.0+4.0FXGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0FXGM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.71.0+4.7FXGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.01.0+4.0FXGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXGM vs STOCK.COM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXGM vs STOCK.COM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXGM and STOCK.COM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXGMSTOCK.COM
Primary Legal NameDepaho LtdSTOCK.COM
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressArtemisia Business Centre, 14 Charalambou Mouskou, 2nd Floor, Office 201, 2014 Nicosia, Cyprus.Kristelina Tower, 12 Arch. Makarios III Avenue, Mesa Geitonia, 2nd Floor, CY 4000, Limassol, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading servicesBinary options, CFDs, Stocks, Metals, Oil
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXGM and STOCK.COM against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXGM vs STOCK.COM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXGM or STOCK.COM?

FXGM holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FXGM maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STOCK.COM maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXGM and STOCK.COM?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXGM records an Overall Score of 5.6 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with STOCK.COM at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FXGM and STOCK.COM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXGM lists FX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while STOCK.COM lists Binary options, CFDs, Stocks, Metals, Oil with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXGM or STOCK.COM?

FXGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STOCK.COM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXGM vs STOCK.COM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire