Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXGM vs Klips: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXGM (Depaho Ltd) and Klips (Klips CY Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

FXGM 6D Score
5.6
Klips 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxgm-vs-klips

Klips outranks FXGM by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.6)

On supervisory breadth, FXGM holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Klips holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXGMKlipsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.66.0+0.4Klips
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0Klips
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0Klips
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.75.0+0.7FXGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXGM vs Klips

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXGM vs Klips
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXGM and Klips.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXGMKlips
Primary Legal NameDepaho LtdKlips CY Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressArtemisia Business Centre, 14 Charalambou Mouskou, 2nd Floor, Office 201, 2014 Nicosia, Cyprus.Chrysanthou Milona 1, Panagides Court, Floor 6, 3030, Limassol, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading servicesCurrencies, commodities, stocks, indices, Amazon, Brent crude oil and more
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, Dutch, Polish, Czech, English, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXGM and Klips against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXGM vs Klips

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXGM or Klips?

Both FXGM and Klips hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXGM maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Klips maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXGM and Klips?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXGM records an Overall Score of 5.6 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Klips at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do FXGM and Klips differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXGM lists FX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Klips lists Currencies, commodities, stocks, indices, Amazon, Brent crude oil and more with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXGM or Klips?

FXGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Klips carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXGM vs Klips (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire