Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Firi vs FXGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Firi (Firi AS) and FXGM (Depaho Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

Firi 6D Score
5.0
FXGM 6D Score
5.6
Regulated Licences
1 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: firi-vs-fxgm

FXGM outranks Firi by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Firi holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FXGM holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFiriFXGMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.6+0.6FXGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.03.0+2.0FXGM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.7+0.7FXGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Firi vs FXGM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Firi vs FXGM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Firi and FXGM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFiriFXGM
Primary Legal NameFiri ASDepaho Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressInternationalArtemisia Business Centre, 14 Charalambou Mouskou, 2nd Floor, Office 201, 2014 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesFX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Firi and FXGM against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Firi vs FXGM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Firi or FXGM?

FXGM holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Firi maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FXGM maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Firi and FXGM?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Firi records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FXGM at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Firi and FXGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Firi lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FXGM lists FX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Firi or FXGM?

Firi carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FXGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Firi vs FXGM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire