Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FIC vs IGM Fore: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FIC (Fidus Investments Cyprus Ltd) and IGM Fore (IGM Fore) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

FIC 6D Score
5.0
IGM Fore 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fic-vs-igm-fore

FIC and IGM Fore are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FIC holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IGM Fore holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFICIGM ForeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FIC vs IGM Fore

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FIC vs IGM Fore
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FIC and IGM Fore.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFICIGM Fore
Primary Legal NameFidus Investments Cyprus LtdIGM Fore
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address16 Kennedy Ave. Nicosia, CyprusAgiou Georgiou Makri 64, ANNA MARIA LENA COURT, Flat 201, 6037 Larnaca, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, CFDs, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), stocks, bonds and derivativesCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, English, French, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FIC and IGM Fore against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FIC vs IGM Fore

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FIC or IGM Fore?

Both FIC and IGM Fore hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FIC maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IGM Fore maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FIC and IGM Fore?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FIC records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with IGM Fore at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FIC and IGM Fore differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FIC lists FX, CFDs, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), stocks, bonds and derivatives with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while IGM Fore lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FIC or IGM Fore?

FIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IGM Fore carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FIC vs IGM Fore (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire