1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Elyps vs FXGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Elyps (Elyps) and FXGM (Depaho Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Elyps 6D Score
- 5.0
- FXGM 6D Score
- 5.6
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FXGM outranks Elyps by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Elyps holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FXGM holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Elyps | FXGM | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.6 | +0.6 | FXGM |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 0.0 | 5.0 | +5.0 | FXGM |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | FXGM |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 0.0 | 5.7 | +5.7 | FXGM |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 0.0 | 5.0 | +5.0 | FXGM |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Elyps vs FXGM
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Elyps | FXGM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Elyps | Depaho Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | Artemisia Business Centre, 14 Charalambou Mouskou, 2nd Floor, Office 201, 2014 Nicosia, Cyprus. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Elyps and FXGM against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Elyps vs FXGM
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Elyps or FXGM?
FXGM holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Elyps maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (AMF) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FXGM maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Elyps and FXGM?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Elyps records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 0.0, Brand: 0.0, Market Influence: 0.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FXGM at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Elyps and FXGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Elyps lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FXGM lists FX, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Elyps or FXGM?
Elyps carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FXGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.