1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Cryptohopper vs Crystal Intelligence: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cryptohopper (Cryptohopper) and Crystal Intelligence (Crystal Blockchain B.V.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Cryptohopper 6D Score
- 5.0
- Crystal Intelligence 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Cryptohopper and Crystal Intelligence are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Cryptohopper holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Crystal Intelligence holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Cryptohopper | Crystal Intelligence | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Cryptohopper |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cryptohopper vs Crystal Intelligence
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Cryptohopper | Crystal Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Cryptohopper | Crystal Blockchain B.V. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Johan van Hasseltweg 18A 1022 WV Amsterdam The Netherlands | NL |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency trading, spot, financial management | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Cryptohopper, Crypto Traden, Crypto Trading | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Dutch, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Cryptohopper and Crystal Intelligence against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Cryptohopper vs Crystal Intelligence
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cryptohopper or Crystal Intelligence?
Both Cryptohopper and Crystal Intelligence hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Cryptohopper maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Crystal Intelligence maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cryptohopper and Crystal Intelligence?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cryptohopper records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Crystal Intelligence at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Cryptohopper and Crystal Intelligence differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Cryptohopper lists Currency trading, spot, financial management with execution software [Cryptohopper, Crypto Traden, Crypto Trading], while Crystal Intelligence lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cryptohopper or Crystal Intelligence?
Cryptohopper carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Crystal Intelligence carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.