1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Chainfund vs Jibrel Network: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Chainfund (Chainfund) and Jibrel Network (Jibrel AG) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Chainfund 6D Score
- 1.0
- Jibrel Network 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Chainfund and Jibrel Network are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Chainfund holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Jibrel Network holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Chainfund | Jibrel Network | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Chainfund vs Jibrel Network
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Chainfund | Jibrel Network |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Chainfund | Jibrel AG |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FINMA: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | CH |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Chainfund and Jibrel Network against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Chainfund vs Jibrel Network
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Chainfund or Jibrel Network?
Chainfund holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Chainfund maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Jibrel Network maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Chainfund and Jibrel Network?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Chainfund records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Jibrel Network at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Chainfund and Jibrel Network differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Chainfund lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Jibrel Network lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Chainfund or Jibrel Network?
Chainfund carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Jibrel Network carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.