Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BKN301 vs MagnetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BKN301 (BKN301 S.p.A.) and MagnetFX (MagnetFX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

BKN301 6D Score
5.0
MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bkn301-vs-magnetfx

MagnetFX outranks BKN301 by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, BKN301 holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBKN301MagnetFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0MagnetFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BKN301 vs MagnetFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BKN301 vs MagnetFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BKN301 and MagnetFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBKN301MagnetFX
Primary Legal NameBKN301 S.p.A.MagnetFX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressVia Tre Settembre 99,47891 Dogana – San MarinoSona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, Indonesia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BKN301 and MagnetFX against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BKN301 vs MagnetFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BKN301 or MagnetFX?

Both BKN301 and MagnetFX hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BKN301 maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM), Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MagnetFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BKN301 and MagnetFX?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BKN301 records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MagnetFX at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do BKN301 and MagnetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BKN301 lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BKN301 or MagnetFX?

BKN301 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BKN301 vs MagnetFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire