Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BKN301 vs FISG: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BKN301 (BKN301 S.p.A.) and FISG (Interstellar Financial Group Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

BKN301 6D Score
5.0
FISG 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bkn301-vs-fisg

BKN301 outranks FISG by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, BKN301 holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FISG holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBKN301FISGScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.04.0+1.0BKN301
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.04.0+1.0BKN301
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.04.0+1.0BKN301
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.04.0+1.0BKN301

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BKN301 vs FISG

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BKN301 vs FISG
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BKN301 and FISG.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBKN301FISG
Primary Legal NameBKN301 S.p.A.Interstellar Financial Group Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressVia Tre Settembre 99,47891 Dogana – San MarinoEuro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesCFDs on foreign exchange, stocks, indices and commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BKN301 and FISG against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BKN301 vs FISG

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BKN301 or FISG?

Both BKN301 and FISG hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BKN301 maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM), Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FISG maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, ASIC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BKN301 and FISG?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BKN301 records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FISG at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do BKN301 and FISG differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BKN301 lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FISG lists CFDs on foreign exchange, stocks, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BKN301 or FISG?

BKN301 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FISG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BKN301 vs FISG (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire