Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BHC vs BKN301: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BHC (BRICKHILL CAPITAL LIMITED) and BKN301 (BKN301 S.p.A.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

BHC 6D Score
5.1
BKN301 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
3 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bhc-vs-bkn301

BHC outranks BKN301 by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.1 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, BHC holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas BKN301 holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBHCBKN301Score DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.15.0+0.1BHC
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.05.0+2.0BKN301
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.65.0+0.6BHC
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.05.0+3.0BKN301

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BHC vs BKN301

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BHC vs BKN301
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BHC and BKN301.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBHCBKN301
Primary Legal NameBRICKHILL CAPITAL LIMITEDBKN301 S.p.A.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address3rd Floor, Standard Chartered Tower, Cybercity, Ebene, 72201, Republic of MauritiusVia Tre Settembre 99,47891 Dogana – San Marino
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCFDs, ForexMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BHC and BKN301 against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BHC vs BKN301

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BHC or BKN301?

BHC holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 2). Specifically, BHC maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, CYSEC, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas BKN301 maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM), Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BHC and BKN301?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BHC records an Overall Score of 5.1 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with BKN301 at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do BHC and BKN301 differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BHC lists CFDs, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while BKN301 lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BHC or BKN301?

BHC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while BKN301 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BHC vs BKN301 (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire