1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Backed Finance vs Interlock: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Backed Finance (Backed Finance AG) and Interlock (Interlock) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- Backed Finance 6D Score
- 2.0
- Interlock 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Backed Finance and Interlock are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Backed Finance holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Interlock holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Backed Finance | Interlock | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Backed Finance vs Interlock
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Backed Finance | Interlock |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Backed Finance AG | Interlock |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FMA: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Baarerstrasse 8, 6300 Zug, Switzerland | CH |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Backed Finance and Interlock against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Backed Finance vs Interlock
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Backed Finance or Interlock?
Backed Finance holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Backed Finance maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Interlock maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Backed Finance and Interlock?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Backed Finance records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Interlock at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Backed Finance and Interlock differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Backed Finance lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Interlock lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Backed Finance or Interlock?
Backed Finance carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Interlock carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.