1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
B2BINPAY vs LMAX Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of B2BINPAY (B2BINPAY ITALY S.R.L.) and LMAX Group (LMAX Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe
- B2BINPAY 6D Score
- 4.0
- LMAX Group 6D Score
- 7.9
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 3
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
LMAX Group outranks B2BINPAY by +3.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, B2BINPAY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | B2BINPAY | LMAX Group | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 7.9 | +3.9 | LMAX Group |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 7.9 | +5.9 | LMAX Group |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | LMAX Group |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 7.9 | +6.9 | LMAX Group |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 7.9 | +5.9 | LMAX Group |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: B2BINPAY vs LMAX Group
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | B2BINPAY | LMAX Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | B2BINPAY ITALY S.R.L. | LMAX Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Estonia, Tallinn 10117, Narva mnt 7b-503, Tallinn, Estonia | Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | B2BinPay is an Estonia-based cryptocurrency payment-solutions provider, established in 2014 | Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Other languages, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare B2BINPAY and LMAX Group against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: B2BINPAY vs LMAX Group
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: B2BINPAY or LMAX Group?
LMAX Group holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, B2BINPAY maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), ) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LMAX Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (FSPR, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between B2BINPAY and LMAX Group?
In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), B2BINPAY records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with LMAX Group at 7.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do B2BINPAY and LMAX Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
B2BINPAY lists B2BinPay is an Estonia-based cryptocurrency payment-solutions provider, established in 2014 with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: B2BINPAY or LMAX Group?
B2BINPAY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.