Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Acadace vs TriumphFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Acadace (Acadace LTD) and TriumphFX (Triumph Int. (Cyprus) Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Forex and CFD brokers authorised in Europe

Acadace 6D Score
2.0
TriumphFX 6D Score
3.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: acadace-vs-triumphfx

TriumphFX outranks Acadace by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, Acadace holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TriumphFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAcadaceTriumphFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.03.0+1.0TriumphFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.03.0+1.0TriumphFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.02.0+1.0TriumphFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Acadace vs TriumphFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Acadace vs TriumphFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Acadace and TriumphFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAcadaceTriumphFX
Primary Legal NameAcadace LTDTriumph Int. (Cyprus) Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressOffice 1a, Limassol Avenue 46E, 2014, Nicosia, Strovolous, Cyprus.Lophitis International Center, 2nd Floor. Corner of Soteri Michaelidi and 28th October Street, CY-3035 Limassol
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesCFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Currencies
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Acadace and TriumphFX against other regulated peers in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Acadace vs TriumphFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Acadace or TriumphFX?

Both Acadace and TriumphFX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Acadace maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TriumphFX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Acadace and TriumphFX?

In FXMacro Wire's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Acadace records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with TriumphFX at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Acadace and TriumphFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Acadace lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while TriumphFX lists CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Currencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Acadace or TriumphFX?

Acadace carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TriumphFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Acadace vs TriumphFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXMacro Wire