Skip to content
FXMacro Wire
Directory

Institution record

Bit2Me

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
3.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
In our coverage
Banco de España
D592RegisteredBit2Me—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bit2Me against peer institutions in our forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bit2Me (this record)
BdE
0 / 1Risk level not supplied3.00
CYSECCONSOB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied6.20
Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)
2 / 2Risk level not supplied5.00
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)
1 / 2Risk level not supplied4.00
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)
2 / 2Risk level not supplied1.00
CNMVCYSEC
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0

Bit2Me: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bit2Me's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bit2Me (legal entity reference: Bit2Me) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: BdE (Banco de España) — licence D592, status: registered. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official BdE public register.

Which of Bit2Me's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on forex and cfd brokers authorised in europe. 1 of Bit2Me's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: BdE (licence D592, registered, entity: Bit2Me). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is Bit2Me's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bit2Me carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 3.0, risk & licensing: 3.0, brand: 3.0, market influence: 3.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bit2Me's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bit2Me, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bit2me.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to BdE.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FXMacro Wire relevant to Bit2Me's supervisory scope.

All research →
Bit2Me — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FXMacro Wire